/ /

  • linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    ACA’s impact on contraception choice


    A first-of-its-kind analysis of claims data before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) shows that the legislation had a significant impact on women’s choice of contraception, with a trend toward increased use of long-term methods, particularly in those aged 18 to 30. The data, from a regional health plan in the upper Midwest, were published in Health Affairs.

    Nearly 30,000 women aged 18 to 46 who had enrolled in insurance plans through 499 employer groups with at least 50 employees were included in the cohort. The treatment group had at least one year-end observation of contraceptive choice before and one after implementation of the ACA, which eliminated cost sharing for prescription contraceptives. The controls were covered by one of 13 employers that had not complied with the ACA mandate as of September 2014.

    The researchers looked at trends in usage of both short-term (hormonal pills, hormone patch, vaginal ring, diaphragm, cervical cap, injectable hormones) and long-term (implants, intrauterine devices, sterilization) contraceptive methods. Prior to ACA, the latter methods were associated with significantly higher up-front costs and the control group was slightly less likely to have chosen prescription contraceptives than the treatment group (26.4% versus 30.2%).

    Related: Should birth control be OTC?

    Before ACA was enacted, usage of short-term and long-methods was 24.6% and 5.6% among women in the treatment group, versus 21.8% and 4.6%, respectively, in the women in the control group. After the removal of cost-sharing for contraception, the percentage of women in the treatment group using long-term methods rose to 9.8% versus 21.2% for short-term methods. A similar trend was seen among women in the control group, with 8.0% and 21.1% using long- and short-term methods, respectively, after ACA.

    When the sample was restricted to women aged 18 to 30, the researchers found that change in cost sharing predicted a 2.81% increase in choice of prescription contraceptives, of which 1.16% was attributable to long-term methods. Those data, the authors said, suggest that “younger women were more sensitive to the elimination of cost sharing, especially when it comes to long-term contraceptive methods.”

    Describing the study’s limitations, the authors cautioned that it reflected the prices of and cultural attitudes about contraception among the population in the upper Midwest and that could not account for use of over-the-counter birth control or of low-cost generics paid for completely out of pocket. They also postulated that some of the trends “could be a secondary effect of increased physician encounters for other preventive services, instead of simply the effect of changes in contraceptive cost sharing.”

    NEXT: Does moderate activity help heart health in younger women?

    Judith M. Orvos, ELS
    Judith M. Orvos, ELS, is a a BELS-certified medical writer and editor and an editorial consultant for Contemporary OB/GYN.


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available


    Latest Tweets Follow