/ /

  • linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Brachial plexus injury causation in newborns debated

    Certain brachial plexus injuries during the birth process are unpreventable and are caused by etiologies other than shoulder dystocia.

    123

    Key iconKey Points

    • Some BPP is not the result of lateral traction on the shoulder during diffi cult deliveries.
    • Fetal malpresentation, congenital or acquired maternal uterine defects, and strong maternal expulsive forces may cause the injury to the nerve plexus.
    • Risk factors for shoulder dystocia include maternal obesity, diabetes, and postterm pregnancy, all linked to macrosomia, as well as labor induction and epidural anesthesia.
    • McRobert's maneuver, suprapubic pressure, rotational maneuvers, and delivery of the posterior arm have all been used with varying degrees of success in relieving shoulder dystocia.

    Conclusion

    There is little doubt that strong lateral traction or rotation of the fetal head can tear or stretch the fetal brachial plexus, resulting in permanent or temporary paralysis, respectively. If true shoulder dystocia exists (which we define as a fetal shoulder obstructed for more than 1 minute), the birth attendant must use all the recommended manipulations described in most obstetric textbooks in an attempt to alleviate the anterior shoulder from behind the symphysis pubis of the mother. No single maneuver appears more successful or less prone to brachial plexus paralysis than another, and there is no specific order in which to perform these procedures.21 However, even meticulous completion of these maneuvers, with release of the impacted shoulder, will not guarantee the absence of BPP.

    How does one measure the level of traction to assure that excessive force is not exerted? We know that the amount of pressure varies with each practitioner. We also know that the amount of force produced by the uterus during contractions varies widely. Further, we know that the amount of force produced by the pushing effort varies widely per person and per pushing attempt. It has also been shown that individual fetal brachial plexuses avulse and stretch in response to different amounts of force.

    Thus, it is impossible to determine the exact amount of traction required to cause injury or whether it occurred before or after the caregiver attempted to relieve the dystocia. In short, although plaintiffs' attorneys in brachial plexus injury cases may argue that BPP always reflects negligence, this is simply untrue. We recommend that continued research focus on the etiologies of BPP, integrating the science of physics to determine the safest method of delivering a healthy infant in spite of shoulder dystocia.

    DR ROSENMAN is associate clinical professor, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. MS SACCO is an attorney at Danaher, Lagnese & Sacco, PC, Hartford, Connecticut. MR SHARIFI is a medical student at Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven.

    REFERENCES

    1. Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. Erb's palsy causation: iatrogenic or resulting from labor forces? J Reprod Med. 2005;50(8):563-566.

    2. Ouzounian JG, Korst LM, Phelan JP. Permanent Erb's palsy: a lack of a relationship with obstetrical risk factors.Am J Perinatol. 1998;15(4):221-223.

    3. Ouzounian JG, Korst LM, Phelan JP. Permanent Erb palsy: a traction-related injury? Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(1):139-141.

    4. Alfonso I, Diaz-Arca G, Alfonso DT, et al. Fetal deformations: a risk factor for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy? Pediatr Neurol. 2006;35(4):246-249.

    5. Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ, Kreinick CJ. Brachial plexus palsy: an old problem revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6 pt 1):1673-1677.

    6. Gurewitsch ED, Johnson TL, Allen RH. After shoulder dystocia: managing subsequent pregnancy and delivery. Semin Perinatol. 2007;31(3):185-195.

    7. Allen RH, Cha SL, Kranker LM, Johnson TL, Gurewitsch ED. Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):539.e1-e5.

    8. Allen RH. On the mechanical aspects of shoulder dystocia and birth injury. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(3):607-623.

    9. Allen RH, Sorab J, Gonik B. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia: an engineering study of clinician-applied forces. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(3):352-355.

    10. Benjamin K. Part 1. Injuries to the brachial plexus: mechanisms of injury and identification of risk factors.Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5(4):181-189.

    11. Benjamin K. Part 2. Distinguishing physical characteristics and management of brachial plexus injuries. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5(5):240-251.

    12. Escamilla JO. Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia: an objective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2):591; author reply 591-592.

    13. Gurewitsch ED, Allen RH. Shoulder dystocia.Clin Perinatol. 2007;34(3):365-385.

    14. Allen RH, Edelberg SC. Brachial plexus palsy causation. Birth. 2003;30(2):141-143; author reply 143-145. Erratum in: Birth. 2003;30(3):210.

    15. Metaizeau JP, Gayet C, Plenat F. Brachial plexus injuries. An experimental study (author's transl) [article in French]. Chir Pediatr. 1979;20(3):159-163.

    16. Stürtz G. Biomechanical data of children. In: Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1980:525-559. Paper 801313.

    17. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Ouzounian JG, Miller DA, Paul RH. Brachial plexus palsy associated with cesarean section: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(5):1162-1164.

    18. Graham EM, Forouzan I, Morgan MA. A retrospective analysis of Erb's palsy cases and their relation to birth weight and trauma at delivery. J Matern Fetal Med. 1997;6(1):1-5.

    19. Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. Associated factors in 1611 cases of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(4):536-540.

    20. Choux M, Di Rocco C, Hockley A, Walker ML, eds. Pediatric Neurosurgery. London: Churchill Livingstone;1999.

    21. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, the American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 40, November 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(5 pt 1):1045-1050.

    123

    Advertisement

    Poll